Obama doesn't think that anything has gone wrong at all, everything he wants is going perfectly. He’s right on track to bring us into a socialist nation. He got Obamacare, going for him.... He got Tens of millions of illegal’s flooding across the unguarded borders. Race relations have never been worse, and getting worse by the day. . IRS and EPA officials are openly breaking the law. And now we have the stock market falling like a rock along with the most dreaded disease in the world hitting our country!
Yeah, everything is going just fine here in the “Good Ole USA”
Thursday, October 16, 2014
Friday, May 2, 2014
Importance? Transparency? Why Transparency Is So Important"
We spent a week or more just watching all those Liberals going
absolutely nuts because there was a story in the headlines about a
senile old white guy ranting off about his Tramp girlfriend who want to
trap him on a phone conversation calling Negro’s names.
And when suddenly, out of the blue, a message from above appeared, a new government email directly that belatedly contradicts the message that Obama, Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and press secretary Jay Carney repeated, and repeated in the immediate aftermath of the attack in Benghazi, and incidentally was something that any sensible person already knew. If they had any brains in that thing called a head. It CONTRADICTS the White House and State Department's story that they “believed” a video led to what was thought to be a spontaneous attack. In that e-mail there is concrete evidence that “Her Thighness” Hillary deliberately and maliciously lied.. (what a shock)!
And by the way, It only took the Lame Stream News ONLY 1 1/2 years to bring this out. Apparently there was much more important news to report, like Traffic Jams and Racial Remarks, so I guess that it’s only fair to cut them some slack.... Rigt your progressive MORON’S who have been making jokes about this for the past Year and a Half! And they are still either quite about it or denying it. You shameless IDIOT’S! Where are you now Ducky, Dave, Liberalmann, Progressive Witch? Where is your respect for the men who died?
Say it loud and say it clear, OBAMA AND HILLARY LIED, AND PEOPLE DIED.
And when suddenly, out of the blue, a message from above appeared, a new government email directly that belatedly contradicts the message that Obama, Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and press secretary Jay Carney repeated, and repeated in the immediate aftermath of the attack in Benghazi, and incidentally was something that any sensible person already knew. If they had any brains in that thing called a head. It CONTRADICTS the White House and State Department's story that they “believed” a video led to what was thought to be a spontaneous attack. In that e-mail there is concrete evidence that “Her Thighness” Hillary deliberately and maliciously lied.. (what a shock)!
And by the way, It only took the Lame Stream News ONLY 1 1/2 years to bring this out. Apparently there was much more important news to report, like Traffic Jams and Racial Remarks, so I guess that it’s only fair to cut them some slack.... Rigt your progressive MORON’S who have been making jokes about this for the past Year and a Half! And they are still either quite about it or denying it. You shameless IDIOT’S! Where are you now Ducky, Dave, Liberalmann, Progressive Witch? Where is your respect for the men who died?
Say it loud and say it clear, OBAMA AND HILLARY LIED, AND PEOPLE DIED.
Thursday, May 1, 2014
Benghazi emails suggest White House aide involved in prepping Susan Rice
Well, well, well. What do we have here? It appears that the narrative of Benghazi being a "spontaneous protest brought on by a video" was the work of none other than White House officials.
Newly released emails on the Benghazi terror attack suggest a senior White House aide played a central role in preparing former U.N. ambassador Susan Rice for her controversial Sunday show appearances -- where she wrongly blamed protests over an Internet video.
More than 100 pages of documents were released to the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. Among them was a Sept. 14, 2012, email from Ben Rhodes, an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic communications.
The Rhodes email, with the subject line: "RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 pm ET," was sent to a dozen members of the administration's inner circle, including key members of the White House communications team such as Press Secretary Jay Carney.
In the email, Rhodes specifically draws attention to the anti-Islam Internet video, without distinguishing whether the Benghazi attack was different from protests elsewhere.
The email lists the following two goals, among others:
"To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy."
"To reinforce the President and Administration's strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges."
The email goes on to state that the U.S. government rejected the message of the Internet video. "We find it disgusting and reprehensible. But there is absolutely no justification at all for responding to this movie with violence," the email stated
Sunday, March 16, 2014
Selective Feminism, Or Women's Rights !
Muslims promote Sharia law.
Christians believe that every person has the right to choose or reject the gospel. We wouldn't think about making our faith a law superior to all other faiths. Imposing it on others as some sort of legal right we are entitled to. God forbid! In this instance you have Democrats, pro abortionists and feminists all across America crying bloody murder, saying that Limbaugh should be taken off the air for his comments in reference to Sandra Fluke . In fact, they have said things to the extent of "Fluke is just an ordinary woman, how dare he say such mean things about her?", "He should be taken off the air or apologize post haste!" (Which he did not soon after).
In the midst of this heated debate I have noticed something. I have observed how some women treat other women differently than others. I have again noticed how this behavior is widely influenced by political or societal events. I also have taken notice of the hypocrisy that it entails. What I am referring to is known as selective feminism. No doubt you have heard the comments issued forth by the right wing Political Shock Jock Rush Limbaugh in reference to Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke, and the firestorm that ensued afterwards.
These very same people have gone on to say that Republicans only want to take away their rights to contraceptives and birth control pills, and that the men, as well as the government, should keep their nose out from between their legs, which I find odd to say the least, since they want a right only the government itself can provide, and also that they allow certain men to fight for them and their "freedom." Okay, lets jump the fence here, to the other side of the political spectrum. I made reference to Fluke and Limbaugh, now lets examine David Letterman and Bill Maher, both Liberals, and their comments about Sarah Palin In June of 2009, David Letterman was caught on air making reference to Sarah Palin as a "slutty flight attendant," going on to make a less than polite joke about her underage daughter Willow!!
"One awkward moment for Sarah Palin at the Yankee game," Letterman said, "during the seventh inning, her daughter was knocked up by Alex Rodriguez."
After Letterman's comment, Sarah Palin immediately responded, accusing him of making inappropriate and sexually perverted statements that he would "have never said about anyone else's daughter, and that "acceptance of sexually inappropriate jokes about someone's underage daughter, who could be anyone's daughter, contributes to the atrociously [sic] high rate of sexual exploitation of minors by older men who use and abuse others," she went on to say. But wait! We then have Bill Maher who, after finding out that Palin had accepted a job as a contributor to Fox News, made this remark about her and her child, Trig, who has Down Syndrome:
“Sarah Palin agreed to do commentary at Fox News, which is actually very similar to her day job, talking to a baby with Down syndrome. Speaking of dumb s**ts, it’s not because they have breasts. It’s because they are boobs."
Once again Palin and the Republican party were outraged. As you know, Sarah Palin is widely known as Republican nominee John McCain's VP candidate, and a Republican herself. In this instance, only the women on the right wing side of the aisle were heard condemning the remarks. Now, here's the kicker, where were the feminists? Where, indeed, were the female Democrats? Not one was to be heard burning her brassiere over these sexually tinged comments, which leads me to my point.
What you saw here was members of feminism being selective of which women to defend, after she is slandered. But then again, a woman is a woman, right? Wrong. Somehow only a Liberal woman is worth defending, but a Conservative one, well, she's on her own. If you happen to be a Liberal woman reading right now, here is a question for you. How come you will defend a woman such as Sandra Fluke, but not ones such as Sarah Palin? They are both women. How can you not be angered when a woman, akin to yourself in all senses of the word, is sexually denigrated by other men? Might it be because she is a conservative? Or maybe it is because she is a pro life advocate? I fail to see the logic in this rationale that one woman is somehow different than another.
We Conservatives support individualism. We support the right of the individual to do what he or SHE wants.
Christians believe that every person has the right to choose or reject the gospel. We wouldn't think about making our faith a law superior to all other faiths. Imposing it on others as some sort of legal right we are entitled to. God forbid! In this instance you have Democrats, pro abortionists and feminists all across America crying bloody murder, saying that Limbaugh should be taken off the air for his comments in reference to Sandra Fluke . In fact, they have said things to the extent of "Fluke is just an ordinary woman, how dare he say such mean things about her?", "He should be taken off the air or apologize post haste!" (Which he did not soon after).
In the midst of this heated debate I have noticed something. I have observed how some women treat other women differently than others. I have again noticed how this behavior is widely influenced by political or societal events. I also have taken notice of the hypocrisy that it entails. What I am referring to is known as selective feminism. No doubt you have heard the comments issued forth by the right wing Political Shock Jock Rush Limbaugh in reference to Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke, and the firestorm that ensued afterwards.
These very same people have gone on to say that Republicans only want to take away their rights to contraceptives and birth control pills, and that the men, as well as the government, should keep their nose out from between their legs, which I find odd to say the least, since they want a right only the government itself can provide, and also that they allow certain men to fight for them and their "freedom." Okay, lets jump the fence here, to the other side of the political spectrum. I made reference to Fluke and Limbaugh, now lets examine David Letterman and Bill Maher, both Liberals, and their comments about Sarah Palin In June of 2009, David Letterman was caught on air making reference to Sarah Palin as a "slutty flight attendant," going on to make a less than polite joke about her underage daughter Willow!!
"One awkward moment for Sarah Palin at the Yankee game," Letterman said, "during the seventh inning, her daughter was knocked up by Alex Rodriguez."
After Letterman's comment, Sarah Palin immediately responded, accusing him of making inappropriate and sexually perverted statements that he would "have never said about anyone else's daughter, and that "acceptance of sexually inappropriate jokes about someone's underage daughter, who could be anyone's daughter, contributes to the atrociously [sic] high rate of sexual exploitation of minors by older men who use and abuse others," she went on to say. But wait! We then have Bill Maher who, after finding out that Palin had accepted a job as a contributor to Fox News, made this remark about her and her child, Trig, who has Down Syndrome:
“Sarah Palin agreed to do commentary at Fox News, which is actually very similar to her day job, talking to a baby with Down syndrome. Speaking of dumb s**ts, it’s not because they have breasts. It’s because they are boobs."
Once again Palin and the Republican party were outraged. As you know, Sarah Palin is widely known as Republican nominee John McCain's VP candidate, and a Republican herself. In this instance, only the women on the right wing side of the aisle were heard condemning the remarks. Now, here's the kicker, where were the feminists? Where, indeed, were the female Democrats? Not one was to be heard burning her brassiere over these sexually tinged comments, which leads me to my point.
What you saw here was members of feminism being selective of which women to defend, after she is slandered. But then again, a woman is a woman, right? Wrong. Somehow only a Liberal woman is worth defending, but a Conservative one, well, she's on her own. If you happen to be a Liberal woman reading right now, here is a question for you. How come you will defend a woman such as Sandra Fluke, but not ones such as Sarah Palin? They are both women. How can you not be angered when a woman, akin to yourself in all senses of the word, is sexually denigrated by other men? Might it be because she is a conservative? Or maybe it is because she is a pro life advocate? I fail to see the logic in this rationale that one woman is somehow different than another.
We Conservatives support individualism. We support the right of the individual to do what he or SHE wants.
Saturday, March 15, 2014
A Culture of Intolerance
It has become quite obvious to me, that there is little tolerance of certain political views that students can hold in school. Especially on hot button issues like abortion. As this 17 year old high school student found out, it's not okay to freely express your worldviews in school. If you don't believe government and politics have any influence in the classroom, you're in for a rude awakening. There is a culture of intolerance expressed by the Liberal teachers, and or professors, that is nurtured in the minds of our children that cannot be allowed to continue. The school should be a place where ideas and views are accepted no matter what they are. The First Amendment applies to everyone, not just to those who hold like views.
People should be able to express themselves freely anywhere without any constraints but one, that such expression doesn't endanger the safety and welfare of others. Speech is nothing but words, words do no harm, actions do.
Free Speech should be unlimited. Where in the First Amendment did the founders issue exceptions?
Liberals have an obvious selective interpretation of the First Amendment when it pertains to undesirable expressions of speech that contradict their worldviews. We call that hypocrisy.
People should be able to express themselves freely anywhere without any constraints but one, that such expression doesn't endanger the safety and welfare of others. Speech is nothing but words, words do no harm, actions do.
Free Speech should be unlimited. Where in the First Amendment did the founders issue exceptions?
Liberals have an obvious selective interpretation of the First Amendment when it pertains to undesirable expressions of speech that contradict their worldviews. We call that hypocrisy.
Monday, February 24, 2014
The Liberal Illusion of Equality and Tolerance.
We see liberals and homosexuals all the time, especially on TV pushing for equal rights and tolerance of homosexuals and the homosexual lifestyle, but yet all I see are contradictions of these beliefs of equality and tolerance. I tell you what liberals and homosexuals... I challenge you to refute this set of statements and answer a few questions for me... I really feel that these groups really don't want equal treatment, they want SPECIAL treatment.
1) If you truly believed in equality, you would believe in a balance of freedom. There is a two way street to equality. You have every right to your lifestyle, but you cannot force others to endorse it.
2) Lets put it another way: You cannot physically marry poles to poles, and holes to holes (HT to Alfonzo Rachel). I'll stand up for your God given rights, but I won't stand for you legislating your desires into laws for us to follow over God's (That means passing same sex marriage laws), whilst accusing us of trying to establish a theocracy. Or forcing people to serve you against their religiously held beliefs.
3) Moreover, you liberals in particular express support for homosexuals, but your select use of homoerotic profanity suggests you have a similar disdain for homosexuality to that of Republicans. If Democrats like you thought homosexuality was so awesome, they nor you would see "teabagging" as a demeaning reference to insult somebody with. If you don't know what teabagging is, you need to look it up in the urban dictionary.
4) You homosexuals demand the right to be treated equally... at the forced expense of someone else. That's not what the Constitution says. You can't have your rights while infringing on someone else's rights. By no means are we Right Wing Christians depriving you of your right to life.
5) The Christian does not deprive you of liberty either. "Well, what about the gay's liberty to be married?" you ask. Nice try, but, you cannot have your liberty at the expense of the Church's or a Christian's liberty.
6) Are conservatives so evil for advocating traditional marriage and a Church's right to free exercise? Is that why you call us "far right wing extremists" or like pejorative terms?
7) Why do you both (liberals and homosexuals) praise someone who is tolerant of homosexuality, but admonish those who don't support it? Didn't you guys get through saying you were all for tolerance and equal acceptance of personally held beliefs? Sounds pretty unequal to tell the truth. Once again, my feeling is that these groups really don't want equal treatment, they want SPECIAL treatment.
8) Jesus himself spoke against homosexuality, (Corinthians 6:9) specifically saying that they would not inherit the Kingdom of God for partaking in such an act. Yet you stand there and tell me that he is this all accepting hippie type. Should he have been such, there would have been no reason for him to come down to Earth to die for the salvation of mankind. He wouldn't have performed his miracles, or healed the sick or afflicted.
9) Why during the debacle with Chic-fil-A in 2012 did you feel the need to stage kiss ins in front of people eating their lunch, during a lunch rush? To me, this is you imposing your lifestyle on unsuspecting strangers at a restaurant.
10) Do you really care about the homosexual cause, liberals? Or are you more concerned with using them at your convenience so as to be seen as more down to Earth or accepting?
11) Why do you homosexuals insist on your love life being none of other peoples business? Or the Government's? When you fight to legalize gay marriage, you are by default making it other people's business, and thus the Governments. When you get your marriage license, who issues it to you? The government.
1) If you truly believed in equality, you would believe in a balance of freedom. There is a two way street to equality. You have every right to your lifestyle, but you cannot force others to endorse it.
2) Lets put it another way: You cannot physically marry poles to poles, and holes to holes (HT to Alfonzo Rachel). I'll stand up for your God given rights, but I won't stand for you legislating your desires into laws for us to follow over God's (That means passing same sex marriage laws), whilst accusing us of trying to establish a theocracy. Or forcing people to serve you against their religiously held beliefs.
3) Moreover, you liberals in particular express support for homosexuals, but your select use of homoerotic profanity suggests you have a similar disdain for homosexuality to that of Republicans. If Democrats like you thought homosexuality was so awesome, they nor you would see "teabagging" as a demeaning reference to insult somebody with. If you don't know what teabagging is, you need to look it up in the urban dictionary.
4) You homosexuals demand the right to be treated equally... at the forced expense of someone else. That's not what the Constitution says. You can't have your rights while infringing on someone else's rights. By no means are we Right Wing Christians depriving you of your right to life.
5) The Christian does not deprive you of liberty either. "Well, what about the gay's liberty to be married?" you ask. Nice try, but, you cannot have your liberty at the expense of the Church's or a Christian's liberty.
6) Are conservatives so evil for advocating traditional marriage and a Church's right to free exercise? Is that why you call us "far right wing extremists" or like pejorative terms?
7) Why do you both (liberals and homosexuals) praise someone who is tolerant of homosexuality, but admonish those who don't support it? Didn't you guys get through saying you were all for tolerance and equal acceptance of personally held beliefs? Sounds pretty unequal to tell the truth. Once again, my feeling is that these groups really don't want equal treatment, they want SPECIAL treatment.
8) Jesus himself spoke against homosexuality, (Corinthians 6:9) specifically saying that they would not inherit the Kingdom of God for partaking in such an act. Yet you stand there and tell me that he is this all accepting hippie type. Should he have been such, there would have been no reason for him to come down to Earth to die for the salvation of mankind. He wouldn't have performed his miracles, or healed the sick or afflicted.
9) Why during the debacle with Chic-fil-A in 2012 did you feel the need to stage kiss ins in front of people eating their lunch, during a lunch rush? To me, this is you imposing your lifestyle on unsuspecting strangers at a restaurant.
10) Do you really care about the homosexual cause, liberals? Or are you more concerned with using them at your convenience so as to be seen as more down to Earth or accepting?
11) Why do you homosexuals insist on your love life being none of other peoples business? Or the Government's? When you fight to legalize gay marriage, you are by default making it other people's business, and thus the Governments. When you get your marriage license, who issues it to you? The government.
Sunday, February 23, 2014
Democrats are continuing to give Obama a Free pass..
Yes, while In my opinion I think Ted Nugent is a fool, who gets too much press, but why would anyone think that HE represents the republican party? Or in any way is a “Hero of the Party”? In my circle of friends, I have yet to meet anyone that thinks he is!
But while the left is SO dammed focused on the remark make by Ted Nugent, who is nothing more than a rock guitarist, and not by any means a spokesman for the republicans, and on this trivial “Black History Month”, they somehow FAIL to focus on the failures of Obama, starting with Obamacare, and the many others like, Jobs, and all the recent SCANDAL’S! .
Of course, lets not focus on the failure of a president, but on a traffic jam on a New Jersey bridge. We should remove the obstacle to the success of this great nation of ours, not simply hope for it to sit there and rot away, along with more of our rights and freedoms with it.
The progressives seems to be ignorant of the fact that Obama's legacy is crumbling right before your very eyes and they’re too blind to see it.
Lets not focus on the fact that Obamacare will double my monthly premium!
Lets not focus on how did Obama's Illegal Aunt seemed to leapfrog over the other 30,000 LEGITIMATE Boston resident’s who applied for Public Housing?
Or the FACT that Michelle Obama had to appear on a Late night Talk show and disrupt traffic for hours when folks were trying to get home and then has the GAUL, the STUPIDITY to call folks under 26 years old “KNUCKLEHEADS”! Is she for real? Maybe thats the people she knows! Most people that I know who are 26 years old are already married and holding some damn good jobs and are making a damn good salary! I wonder if she thinks of Sasha and Malia that way? Someone should tell the “Moocher” that drawing Red Lines have consequences! That may very well turn out to be a remark of a “KNUCKLEHEAD”
Could it be that she is referring to the millions of young people who are suddenly realizing that Obamacare does not offer them the affordable health care. they were counting one, and now realize that it’s a lie, and they aren’t buying it, literally!!.
And also, by calling people who express their likeness for the Confederacy "TRASH." you show how much you don't want them expressing their First Amendment rights.
It’s painful to watch otherwise intelligent people lend support to something that’ s so obviously bad!
Do these people understand how stupid and preposterous they sound?
But while the left is SO dammed focused on the remark make by Ted Nugent, who is nothing more than a rock guitarist, and not by any means a spokesman for the republicans, and on this trivial “Black History Month”, they somehow FAIL to focus on the failures of Obama, starting with Obamacare, and the many others like, Jobs, and all the recent SCANDAL’S! .
Of course, lets not focus on the failure of a president, but on a traffic jam on a New Jersey bridge. We should remove the obstacle to the success of this great nation of ours, not simply hope for it to sit there and rot away, along with more of our rights and freedoms with it.
The progressives seems to be ignorant of the fact that Obama's legacy is crumbling right before your very eyes and they’re too blind to see it.
Lets not focus on the fact that Obamacare will double my monthly premium!
Lets not focus on how did Obama's Illegal Aunt seemed to leapfrog over the other 30,000 LEGITIMATE Boston resident’s who applied for Public Housing?
Or the FACT that Michelle Obama had to appear on a Late night Talk show and disrupt traffic for hours when folks were trying to get home and then has the GAUL, the STUPIDITY to call folks under 26 years old “KNUCKLEHEADS”! Is she for real? Maybe thats the people she knows! Most people that I know who are 26 years old are already married and holding some damn good jobs and are making a damn good salary! I wonder if she thinks of Sasha and Malia that way? Someone should tell the “Moocher” that drawing Red Lines have consequences! That may very well turn out to be a remark of a “KNUCKLEHEAD”
Could it be that she is referring to the millions of young people who are suddenly realizing that Obamacare does not offer them the affordable health care. they were counting one, and now realize that it’s a lie, and they aren’t buying it, literally!!.
And also, by calling people who express their likeness for the Confederacy "TRASH." you show how much you don't want them expressing their First Amendment rights.
It’s painful to watch otherwise intelligent people lend support to something that’ s so obviously bad!
Do these people understand how stupid and preposterous they sound?
Tuesday, January 28, 2014
The State of Our Union? 2014
I just can't tell anymore. Our Union seems to be slowly drifting away down hill towards certain oblivion. I then hear those saying that it's best times are to come. I've come to the conclusion that the state of our union has stagnated. The gridlock in Washington has brought the rest of America to a standstill. Five years ago we had a man promising to bring change to America, hope as well. I've looked all over, far and wide for this hope and change; but yet, I see that the union still remains hopeless and changeless and more divided.
This leftist President will claim the state of the union as being strong, but even he knows that’s a lie.
The same petulant liars, cheats, fraudsters and crooks are being elected to office every two to four years. and as in today’s case eight years. The same promises and lies are being told. The utopian promises are made but never kept. This stagnation has breached the hearts and minds of the average American citizen. The State of our Union is divided...fractured. Dishonesty and propaganda prevail. Truth, and those who tell it, are despised. Americans no longer see each other as compatriots, but as enemies. The same things that many presidents (including this one) have promised to stop, still rage on in this Union to this very day.
I have yet to ascertain the state of this union. For something to have a state, it needs to have a noticeable direction. One can say "well, America is regressing." No it isn't. This type of regression has reached it's end result. The bickering, infighting, lying, cheating and political scandals are now the norm. But then one could say, "well, America is progressing." No, it isn't. When Presidents and politicians are willing to violate our constitutional rights, it serves to sate the status quo of our final regression. When parties refuse to work with one another, the same is also true.
What actually is the State of Our Union? Right now, it appears to be ensnared in the hands of those who would rather it stay the way it is. America is stuck in a limbo that only the people can pull it out of. What will be the state of our union in the future? For there to be a state (as I said before) there needs to be direction. If our elected officials can't take this country where it needs to go, then the state of our union will never change. It will remain forever hostile and unchanging. If the people learn to think for themselves and reach for the truth, the state of our union would be something to look forward to. I'm hoping that one day it will be.
What is the state of the union? Simple a sad state of affairs, with a leader who hasn’t any clue as how to run this country. .
What IS the state of our union? That's up to you, America
This leftist President will claim the state of the union as being strong, but even he knows that’s a lie.
The same petulant liars, cheats, fraudsters and crooks are being elected to office every two to four years. and as in today’s case eight years. The same promises and lies are being told. The utopian promises are made but never kept. This stagnation has breached the hearts and minds of the average American citizen. The State of our Union is divided...fractured. Dishonesty and propaganda prevail. Truth, and those who tell it, are despised. Americans no longer see each other as compatriots, but as enemies. The same things that many presidents (including this one) have promised to stop, still rage on in this Union to this very day.
I have yet to ascertain the state of this union. For something to have a state, it needs to have a noticeable direction. One can say "well, America is regressing." No it isn't. This type of regression has reached it's end result. The bickering, infighting, lying, cheating and political scandals are now the norm. But then one could say, "well, America is progressing." No, it isn't. When Presidents and politicians are willing to violate our constitutional rights, it serves to sate the status quo of our final regression. When parties refuse to work with one another, the same is also true.
What actually is the State of Our Union? Right now, it appears to be ensnared in the hands of those who would rather it stay the way it is. America is stuck in a limbo that only the people can pull it out of. What will be the state of our union in the future? For there to be a state (as I said before) there needs to be direction. If our elected officials can't take this country where it needs to go, then the state of our union will never change. It will remain forever hostile and unchanging. If the people learn to think for themselves and reach for the truth, the state of our union would be something to look forward to. I'm hoping that one day it will be.
What is the state of the union? Simple a sad state of affairs, with a leader who hasn’t any clue as how to run this country. .
What IS the state of our union? That's up to you, America
Wednesday, January 22, 2014
If You Are A "Extreme Conservative" Then You Are No Longer Welcome Here!
You Are No Longer Welcome! Oh Really!
If You Are A "Extreme Conservative" Then You Are No Longer Welcome!
Who are they, those extreme conservatives, who are right-to-life, pro-assault-weapon, anti-gay? Is that who they are? Because if that’s who they are and they’re the extreme conservatives, then they have no place in the state of New York, because that’s not who New Yorkers are."
Those were the words uttered by New York Governor Andrew Cuomo. These words have also signaled to me the arrival of something I've feared in America. This something is an era of hyper-partisanship, where mere political affiliation can warrant someone telling you "you have no place here." Has our partisanship reached such a level where we tell someone they no longer belong in the same state as you? Where will those of similar political leanings be speaking out against this?
Do Democrats and Republicans alike not have the same right to live in New York or anywhere? It was bad enough segregating blacks and whites some 50 and 60 years ago, now we must segregate between the letters "D" and "R"? This is why I speak in support of bipartisanship. This is why I favor it. For this is what partisanship will reap.
One will say "I will never get along with them." But I say you don't have to. However it isn't right or moral to begrudge them a place among their fellow Americans that they have made for themselves to live because of what their political beliefs are. The law notwithstanding, a man of any idea or philosophy should be welcome in America.
What Governor Cuomo demonstrated to the rest of America is an utter lack of tolerance, a lack of goodwill. No aspect of partisanship towards his fellow New Yorkers. The onus rests with the people who elected him, those people being the Democrats themselves. He is the manifestation of the intolerance they profess to combat. Cuomo represents an aspect of hatred that Democrats claim not to possess towards those of different beliefs.
First Obama, then Rahm, and now Andrew Cuomo. Liberals really think they own this country, don't they? I should leave MY State or MY Country leave America because I dare to criticize something that this government does.
Like Father, Like Son! What the HELL is going on in this Country
Who are they, those extreme conservatives, who are right-to-life, pro-assault-weapon, anti-gay? Is that who they are? Because if that’s who they are and they’re the extreme conservatives, then they have no place in the state of New York, because that’s not who New Yorkers are."
Those were the words uttered by New York Governor Andrew Cuomo. These words have also signaled to me the arrival of something I've feared in America. This something is an era of hyper-partisanship, where mere political affiliation can warrant someone telling you "you have no place here." Has our partisanship reached such a level where we tell someone they no longer belong in the same state as you? Where will those of similar political leanings be speaking out against this?
Do Democrats and Republicans alike not have the same right to live in New York or anywhere? It was bad enough segregating blacks and whites some 50 and 60 years ago, now we must segregate between the letters "D" and "R"? This is why I speak in support of bipartisanship. This is why I favor it. For this is what partisanship will reap.
One will say "I will never get along with them." But I say you don't have to. However it isn't right or moral to begrudge them a place among their fellow Americans that they have made for themselves to live because of what their political beliefs are. The law notwithstanding, a man of any idea or philosophy should be welcome in America.
What Governor Cuomo demonstrated to the rest of America is an utter lack of tolerance, a lack of goodwill. No aspect of partisanship towards his fellow New Yorkers. The onus rests with the people who elected him, those people being the Democrats themselves. He is the manifestation of the intolerance they profess to combat. Cuomo represents an aspect of hatred that Democrats claim not to possess towards those of different beliefs.
First Obama, then Rahm, and now Andrew Cuomo. Liberals really think they own this country, don't they? I should leave MY State or MY Country leave America because I dare to criticize something that this government does.
Like Father, Like Son! What the HELL is going on in this Country
Saturday, January 11, 2014
So it boils down to this, when your deciding who to vote for president, your going to have to decide which political scandal is worse and just dealt with it.
Scandal
A) is when you are a corrupt douchebag, and you hire, promote and give bonuses to other corrupt douchebags, and when you to do corrupt and douchebaggy things and pretend none of it is going on (Like our current President)
Scandal
B) Maybe drawn our attention away from Hillary 'What Difference does it Make?" Clinton (re: Benghazi) The miserable lying, corrupt crook, who didn’t know a thing about the highly speculative commodity market yet turned a Invested $1,000, and Netted $100,000
Scandal
B) The Bosnia sniper story being a mistake, or she “ Mispoke”!
Then Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said she made a mistake when she claimed she had come under sniper fire during a trip to Bosnia in 1996 while she was first lady. When Hillary Clinton described how she and her daughter, Chelsea, ran for cover under hostile fire shortly after her plane landed in Tuzla, Bosnia. Mispoke? Mistake? Ir was a LYE! What not use that word?
And then there is The Chris Christie’s scandal “Bridgegate” Yes there is something
there, And the question is what did Chris Christie know about it and when did he know it?
But does that compare with the Lies and the crookedness of Her Thighness?
Think about it!
Scandal
A) is when you are a corrupt douchebag, and you hire, promote and give bonuses to other corrupt douchebags, and when you to do corrupt and douchebaggy things and pretend none of it is going on (Like our current President)
Scandal
B) Maybe drawn our attention away from Hillary 'What Difference does it Make?" Clinton (re: Benghazi) The miserable lying, corrupt crook, who didn’t know a thing about the highly speculative commodity market yet turned a Invested $1,000, and Netted $100,000
Scandal
B) The Bosnia sniper story being a mistake, or she “ Mispoke”!
Then Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said she made a mistake when she claimed she had come under sniper fire during a trip to Bosnia in 1996 while she was first lady. When Hillary Clinton described how she and her daughter, Chelsea, ran for cover under hostile fire shortly after her plane landed in Tuzla, Bosnia. Mispoke? Mistake? Ir was a LYE! What not use that word?
And then there is The Chris Christie’s scandal “Bridgegate” Yes there is something
there, And the question is what did Chris Christie know about it and when did he know it?
But does that compare with the Lies and the crookedness of Her Thighness?
Think about it!
Sunday, January 5, 2014
An Interesting Observation
After reading the “progressives” blog, I find that the very people
SCREAMING tolerance are so Intolerant, but then again, you can't excuse
stupidity.
It's funny how people are more interested in unity and acceptance than truth.
These Libs or Progressives or Socialists as I prefer to call them, are only tolerant as long as you agree with them. Please! Do whatever the heck you want with your life, but don't try to force me to accept it.
The Nazis were unified as these folks are, but they were unified to do evil. Furthermore, while we should accept people when it means that we have to accept or agree with their lifestyles. Do I accept drug dealers as people for whom Jesus Christ died,? But I definitely DO NOT accept the fact that they are destroying communities all across America.
Now we get to Robertson, Paul Robertson DID NOT say anything more about homosexuals than the Bible said, so if you have a problem let it not be with Robertson, but take it up with God.
For in all honesty, that is Who all these people are mad at. They are mad at God because His Word says that mankind lying with mankind as with womankind (homosexuality) is a SIN just like adultery, murder, etc. Don't get mad at the man who simply carried the message-on that issue--but get mad at the God who sent the message in the first place. Sadly, I get the sneaky suspicion that if some of these people could take God down off His throne, they would accuse Him of hate speech too.
Why is this so hard for these people to understand?
I truly support and hold highly the statements of Paul Robertson. Why must we remain quiet and tolerant of homosexuals, while they are actively flaunting their lifestyles in our faces. Why do these progressives get so Pissed off when we want to respect Paul Robertson’s right to speak his mind. “FREE SPEECH” When a man speaks out against anything he believes in he has the right to do so, he is a Godly man and that is his right. If you were expecting anything less then you shouldn't have asked the question. He is true to God and his family and that I respect him for.
It's funny how people are more interested in unity and acceptance than truth.
These Libs or Progressives or Socialists as I prefer to call them, are only tolerant as long as you agree with them. Please! Do whatever the heck you want with your life, but don't try to force me to accept it.
The Nazis were unified as these folks are, but they were unified to do evil. Furthermore, while we should accept people when it means that we have to accept or agree with their lifestyles. Do I accept drug dealers as people for whom Jesus Christ died,? But I definitely DO NOT accept the fact that they are destroying communities all across America.
Now we get to Robertson, Paul Robertson DID NOT say anything more about homosexuals than the Bible said, so if you have a problem let it not be with Robertson, but take it up with God.
For in all honesty, that is Who all these people are mad at. They are mad at God because His Word says that mankind lying with mankind as with womankind (homosexuality) is a SIN just like adultery, murder, etc. Don't get mad at the man who simply carried the message-on that issue--but get mad at the God who sent the message in the first place. Sadly, I get the sneaky suspicion that if some of these people could take God down off His throne, they would accuse Him of hate speech too.
Why is this so hard for these people to understand?
I truly support and hold highly the statements of Paul Robertson. Why must we remain quiet and tolerant of homosexuals, while they are actively flaunting their lifestyles in our faces. Why do these progressives get so Pissed off when we want to respect Paul Robertson’s right to speak his mind. “FREE SPEECH” When a man speaks out against anything he believes in he has the right to do so, he is a Godly man and that is his right. If you were expecting anything less then you shouldn't have asked the question. He is true to God and his family and that I respect him for.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)