I just can't tell anymore. Our Union seems to be slowly drifting away down hill towards certain oblivion. I then hear those saying that it's best times are to come. I've come to the conclusion that the state of our union has stagnated. The gridlock in Washington has brought the rest of America to a standstill. Five years ago we had a man promising to bring change to America, hope as well. I've looked all over, far and wide for this hope and change; but yet, I see that the union still remains hopeless and changeless and more divided.
This leftist President will claim the state of the union as being strong, but even he knows that’s a lie.
The same petulant liars, cheats, fraudsters and crooks are being elected to office every two to four years. and as in today’s case eight years. The same promises and lies are being told. The utopian promises are made but never kept. This stagnation has breached the hearts and minds of the average American citizen. The State of our Union is divided...fractured. Dishonesty and propaganda prevail. Truth, and those who tell it, are despised. Americans no longer see each other as compatriots, but as enemies. The same things that many presidents (including this one) have promised to stop, still rage on in this Union to this very day.
I have yet to ascertain the state of this union. For something to have a state, it needs to have a noticeable direction. One can say "well, America is regressing." No it isn't. This type of regression has reached it's end result. The bickering, infighting, lying, cheating and political scandals are now the norm. But then one could say, "well, America is progressing." No, it isn't. When Presidents and politicians are willing to violate our constitutional rights, it serves to sate the status quo of our final regression. When parties refuse to work with one another, the same is also true.
What actually is the State of Our Union? Right now, it appears to be ensnared in the hands of those who would rather it stay the way it is. America is stuck in a limbo that only the people can pull it out of. What will be the state of our union in the future? For there to be a state (as I said before) there needs to be direction. If our elected officials can't take this country where it needs to go, then the state of our union will never change. It will remain forever hostile and unchanging. If the people learn to think for themselves and reach for the truth, the state of our union would be something to look forward to. I'm hoping that one day it will be.
What is the state of the union? Simple a sad state of affairs, with a leader who hasn’t any clue as how to run this country. .
What IS the state of our union? That's up to you, America
Tuesday, January 28, 2014
Wednesday, January 22, 2014
If You Are A "Extreme Conservative" Then You Are No Longer Welcome Here!
You Are No Longer Welcome! Oh Really!
If You Are A "Extreme Conservative" Then You Are No Longer Welcome!
Who are they, those extreme conservatives, who are right-to-life, pro-assault-weapon, anti-gay? Is that who they are? Because if that’s who they are and they’re the extreme conservatives, then they have no place in the state of New York, because that’s not who New Yorkers are."
Those were the words uttered by New York Governor Andrew Cuomo. These words have also signaled to me the arrival of something I've feared in America. This something is an era of hyper-partisanship, where mere political affiliation can warrant someone telling you "you have no place here." Has our partisanship reached such a level where we tell someone they no longer belong in the same state as you? Where will those of similar political leanings be speaking out against this?
Do Democrats and Republicans alike not have the same right to live in New York or anywhere? It was bad enough segregating blacks and whites some 50 and 60 years ago, now we must segregate between the letters "D" and "R"? This is why I speak in support of bipartisanship. This is why I favor it. For this is what partisanship will reap.
One will say "I will never get along with them." But I say you don't have to. However it isn't right or moral to begrudge them a place among their fellow Americans that they have made for themselves to live because of what their political beliefs are. The law notwithstanding, a man of any idea or philosophy should be welcome in America.
What Governor Cuomo demonstrated to the rest of America is an utter lack of tolerance, a lack of goodwill. No aspect of partisanship towards his fellow New Yorkers. The onus rests with the people who elected him, those people being the Democrats themselves. He is the manifestation of the intolerance they profess to combat. Cuomo represents an aspect of hatred that Democrats claim not to possess towards those of different beliefs.
First Obama, then Rahm, and now Andrew Cuomo. Liberals really think they own this country, don't they? I should leave MY State or MY Country leave America because I dare to criticize something that this government does.
Like Father, Like Son! What the HELL is going on in this Country
Who are they, those extreme conservatives, who are right-to-life, pro-assault-weapon, anti-gay? Is that who they are? Because if that’s who they are and they’re the extreme conservatives, then they have no place in the state of New York, because that’s not who New Yorkers are."
Those were the words uttered by New York Governor Andrew Cuomo. These words have also signaled to me the arrival of something I've feared in America. This something is an era of hyper-partisanship, where mere political affiliation can warrant someone telling you "you have no place here." Has our partisanship reached such a level where we tell someone they no longer belong in the same state as you? Where will those of similar political leanings be speaking out against this?
Do Democrats and Republicans alike not have the same right to live in New York or anywhere? It was bad enough segregating blacks and whites some 50 and 60 years ago, now we must segregate between the letters "D" and "R"? This is why I speak in support of bipartisanship. This is why I favor it. For this is what partisanship will reap.
One will say "I will never get along with them." But I say you don't have to. However it isn't right or moral to begrudge them a place among their fellow Americans that they have made for themselves to live because of what their political beliefs are. The law notwithstanding, a man of any idea or philosophy should be welcome in America.
What Governor Cuomo demonstrated to the rest of America is an utter lack of tolerance, a lack of goodwill. No aspect of partisanship towards his fellow New Yorkers. The onus rests with the people who elected him, those people being the Democrats themselves. He is the manifestation of the intolerance they profess to combat. Cuomo represents an aspect of hatred that Democrats claim not to possess towards those of different beliefs.
First Obama, then Rahm, and now Andrew Cuomo. Liberals really think they own this country, don't they? I should leave MY State or MY Country leave America because I dare to criticize something that this government does.
Like Father, Like Son! What the HELL is going on in this Country
Saturday, January 11, 2014
So it boils down to this, when your deciding who to vote for president, your going to have to decide which political scandal is worse and just dealt with it.
Scandal
A) is when you are a corrupt douchebag, and you hire, promote and give bonuses to other corrupt douchebags, and when you to do corrupt and douchebaggy things and pretend none of it is going on (Like our current President)
Scandal
B) Maybe drawn our attention away from Hillary 'What Difference does it Make?" Clinton (re: Benghazi) The miserable lying, corrupt crook, who didn’t know a thing about the highly speculative commodity market yet turned a Invested $1,000, and Netted $100,000
Scandal
B) The Bosnia sniper story being a mistake, or she “ Mispoke”!
Then Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said she made a mistake when she claimed she had come under sniper fire during a trip to Bosnia in 1996 while she was first lady. When Hillary Clinton described how she and her daughter, Chelsea, ran for cover under hostile fire shortly after her plane landed in Tuzla, Bosnia. Mispoke? Mistake? Ir was a LYE! What not use that word?
And then there is The Chris Christie’s scandal “Bridgegate” Yes there is something
there, And the question is what did Chris Christie know about it and when did he know it?
But does that compare with the Lies and the crookedness of Her Thighness?
Think about it!
Scandal
A) is when you are a corrupt douchebag, and you hire, promote and give bonuses to other corrupt douchebags, and when you to do corrupt and douchebaggy things and pretend none of it is going on (Like our current President)
Scandal
B) Maybe drawn our attention away from Hillary 'What Difference does it Make?" Clinton (re: Benghazi) The miserable lying, corrupt crook, who didn’t know a thing about the highly speculative commodity market yet turned a Invested $1,000, and Netted $100,000
Scandal
B) The Bosnia sniper story being a mistake, or she “ Mispoke”!
Then Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said she made a mistake when she claimed she had come under sniper fire during a trip to Bosnia in 1996 while she was first lady. When Hillary Clinton described how she and her daughter, Chelsea, ran for cover under hostile fire shortly after her plane landed in Tuzla, Bosnia. Mispoke? Mistake? Ir was a LYE! What not use that word?
And then there is The Chris Christie’s scandal “Bridgegate” Yes there is something
there, And the question is what did Chris Christie know about it and when did he know it?
But does that compare with the Lies and the crookedness of Her Thighness?
Think about it!
Sunday, January 5, 2014
An Interesting Observation
After reading the “progressives” blog, I find that the very people
SCREAMING tolerance are so Intolerant, but then again, you can't excuse
stupidity.
It's funny how people are more interested in unity and acceptance than truth.
These Libs or Progressives or Socialists as I prefer to call them, are only tolerant as long as you agree with them. Please! Do whatever the heck you want with your life, but don't try to force me to accept it.
The Nazis were unified as these folks are, but they were unified to do evil. Furthermore, while we should accept people when it means that we have to accept or agree with their lifestyles. Do I accept drug dealers as people for whom Jesus Christ died,? But I definitely DO NOT accept the fact that they are destroying communities all across America.
Now we get to Robertson, Paul Robertson DID NOT say anything more about homosexuals than the Bible said, so if you have a problem let it not be with Robertson, but take it up with God.
For in all honesty, that is Who all these people are mad at. They are mad at God because His Word says that mankind lying with mankind as with womankind (homosexuality) is a SIN just like adultery, murder, etc. Don't get mad at the man who simply carried the message-on that issue--but get mad at the God who sent the message in the first place. Sadly, I get the sneaky suspicion that if some of these people could take God down off His throne, they would accuse Him of hate speech too.
Why is this so hard for these people to understand?
I truly support and hold highly the statements of Paul Robertson. Why must we remain quiet and tolerant of homosexuals, while they are actively flaunting their lifestyles in our faces. Why do these progressives get so Pissed off when we want to respect Paul Robertson’s right to speak his mind. “FREE SPEECH” When a man speaks out against anything he believes in he has the right to do so, he is a Godly man and that is his right. If you were expecting anything less then you shouldn't have asked the question. He is true to God and his family and that I respect him for.
It's funny how people are more interested in unity and acceptance than truth.
These Libs or Progressives or Socialists as I prefer to call them, are only tolerant as long as you agree with them. Please! Do whatever the heck you want with your life, but don't try to force me to accept it.
The Nazis were unified as these folks are, but they were unified to do evil. Furthermore, while we should accept people when it means that we have to accept or agree with their lifestyles. Do I accept drug dealers as people for whom Jesus Christ died,? But I definitely DO NOT accept the fact that they are destroying communities all across America.
Now we get to Robertson, Paul Robertson DID NOT say anything more about homosexuals than the Bible said, so if you have a problem let it not be with Robertson, but take it up with God.
For in all honesty, that is Who all these people are mad at. They are mad at God because His Word says that mankind lying with mankind as with womankind (homosexuality) is a SIN just like adultery, murder, etc. Don't get mad at the man who simply carried the message-on that issue--but get mad at the God who sent the message in the first place. Sadly, I get the sneaky suspicion that if some of these people could take God down off His throne, they would accuse Him of hate speech too.
Why is this so hard for these people to understand?
I truly support and hold highly the statements of Paul Robertson. Why must we remain quiet and tolerant of homosexuals, while they are actively flaunting their lifestyles in our faces. Why do these progressives get so Pissed off when we want to respect Paul Robertson’s right to speak his mind. “FREE SPEECH” When a man speaks out against anything he believes in he has the right to do so, he is a Godly man and that is his right. If you were expecting anything less then you shouldn't have asked the question. He is true to God and his family and that I respect him for.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)