Let us count the way............................. if I have enough space.
The e-mail servers, the Benghazi cover-up and lies,the staged photo ops and publicity stunts with fake voters trying to portray her as a "champion of the American people," the "Scooby Machine," stiffing tips to the employees of a Chipotle (as a result, you 99 precentors can stuff your hypocritical class warfare arguments), parking in the handicap parking zone at Council Bluffs Cafe in Iowa, pulling her own Brian Williams by claiming to Have Arrived under Sniper Fire in Bosnia, and the litany goes on and on. Oh and lets not leave out that the Clinton Foundation took money and continues to take money from countries who abuse and brutalize women, such as Saudi Arabia (recall her speech in 1995 about women's rights, and as another result, those of you who call yourselves liberal feminists can swiftly shove your highly hypocritical arguments) and finally, lying about the immigrant roots of her grandparents.
As for the e-mails, she claimed that the e-mails were to "Her Hubby", there just one little problem…(Bill Clinton “her Hubby) said that he doesn’t use email.
Well, let's just put it another, more succinct way. Hillary Clinton's campaign (so far) is pathetic, not to mention she isn't quite the classy character herself. Her behavior during the last 7 years, and the first week of her campaign makes Obama and his campaigns look honest in comparison.
But let's stop for a moment and focus on one singular event. The reaction of the media, and why it shows just how badly they want her floundering campaign to succeed, and amid her conscious attempts to avoid them. The media's reaction is sad to behold, and makes a mockery of the journalistic establishment. But to me, it shows just how sorry and desperate Hillary's campaign has become.
And the newest Bizarre Escapade in Hillary’s life is Hillary's motorcade (Scooby Van and all) arrives at a campaign event in Iowa Tuesday, the media completely loses it. Think of the girls swooning over Elvis, or the Beatles, a hot jock--or Justin Bieber. Now, watch as these reporters frenetically try to catch a glimpse of her motorcade as it arrives. If you didn't believe the liberal media was biased before, the video below should assuage all of those doubts.
She claims to fight for living wage, and as a multimillionaire stiffs tips for employees at a Chipotle, lies like Brian Williams, stages photo-ops with three "ordinary Americans" driven to the Cafe by her political director, and claims to be for women's rights, yet takes in money from countries who persecute them. Why, in any reality would you vote for her? Does she come over as trustworthy to you?
So please Mr. and Mrs. Liberal, please tell me honestly, because I’m still very befuddled, why would you vote for this women?
Friday, April 17, 2015
Saturday, February 7, 2015
In regards to Obama's comments at the National Prayer Breakfast
I'll cut to the chase. In a classic attempt at moral relativism, Obama made a comment that as ISIS commits atrocities in the name of Allah today, the Crusaders/Inquisition did the same in the name of Christ..
Even if you counted each direct or indirect death as a result of the inquisition, it would still not come even close to the Muslim genocides. You Liberal’s will have to do better than that...Condemn what Islam is doing today in the name of Allah.
At least be that honest
Seriously, though, it doesn't take a genius (or a liberal) to understand how murderous Islam can be. And as I just pointed out, Christianity by far has been far less genocidal than Islam over the centuries. Obama got his history all wrong. he’s absolutely pathetic.
Thursday, October 16, 2014
Where Did Obama Go Wrong?
Obama doesn't think that anything has gone wrong at all, everything he wants is going perfectly. He’s right on track to bring us into a socialist nation. He got Obamacare, going for him.... He got Tens of millions of illegal’s flooding across the unguarded borders. Race relations have never been worse, and getting worse by the day. . IRS and EPA officials are openly breaking the law. And now we have the stock market falling like a rock along with the most dreaded disease in the world hitting our country!
Yeah, everything is going just fine here in the “Good Ole USA”
Yeah, everything is going just fine here in the “Good Ole USA”
Friday, May 2, 2014
Importance? Transparency? Why Transparency Is So Important"
We spent a week or more just watching all those Liberals going
absolutely nuts because there was a story in the headlines about a
senile old white guy ranting off about his Tramp girlfriend who want to
trap him on a phone conversation calling Negro’s names.
And when suddenly, out of the blue, a message from above appeared, a new government email directly that belatedly contradicts the message that Obama, Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and press secretary Jay Carney repeated, and repeated in the immediate aftermath of the attack in Benghazi, and incidentally was something that any sensible person already knew. If they had any brains in that thing called a head. It CONTRADICTS the White House and State Department's story that they “believed” a video led to what was thought to be a spontaneous attack. In that e-mail there is concrete evidence that “Her Thighness” Hillary deliberately and maliciously lied.. (what a shock)!
And by the way, It only took the Lame Stream News ONLY 1 1/2 years to bring this out. Apparently there was much more important news to report, like Traffic Jams and Racial Remarks, so I guess that it’s only fair to cut them some slack.... Rigt your progressive MORON’S who have been making jokes about this for the past Year and a Half! And they are still either quite about it or denying it. You shameless IDIOT’S! Where are you now Ducky, Dave, Liberalmann, Progressive Witch? Where is your respect for the men who died?
Say it loud and say it clear, OBAMA AND HILLARY LIED, AND PEOPLE DIED.
And when suddenly, out of the blue, a message from above appeared, a new government email directly that belatedly contradicts the message that Obama, Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and press secretary Jay Carney repeated, and repeated in the immediate aftermath of the attack in Benghazi, and incidentally was something that any sensible person already knew. If they had any brains in that thing called a head. It CONTRADICTS the White House and State Department's story that they “believed” a video led to what was thought to be a spontaneous attack. In that e-mail there is concrete evidence that “Her Thighness” Hillary deliberately and maliciously lied.. (what a shock)!
And by the way, It only took the Lame Stream News ONLY 1 1/2 years to bring this out. Apparently there was much more important news to report, like Traffic Jams and Racial Remarks, so I guess that it’s only fair to cut them some slack.... Rigt your progressive MORON’S who have been making jokes about this for the past Year and a Half! And they are still either quite about it or denying it. You shameless IDIOT’S! Where are you now Ducky, Dave, Liberalmann, Progressive Witch? Where is your respect for the men who died?
Say it loud and say it clear, OBAMA AND HILLARY LIED, AND PEOPLE DIED.
Thursday, May 1, 2014
Benghazi emails suggest White House aide involved in prepping Susan Rice
Well, well, well. What do we have here? It appears that the narrative of Benghazi being a "spontaneous protest brought on by a video" was the work of none other than White House officials.
Newly released emails on the Benghazi terror attack suggest a senior White House aide played a central role in preparing former U.N. ambassador Susan Rice for her controversial Sunday show appearances -- where she wrongly blamed protests over an Internet video.
More than 100 pages of documents were released to the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. Among them was a Sept. 14, 2012, email from Ben Rhodes, an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic communications.
The Rhodes email, with the subject line: "RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 pm ET," was sent to a dozen members of the administration's inner circle, including key members of the White House communications team such as Press Secretary Jay Carney.
In the email, Rhodes specifically draws attention to the anti-Islam Internet video, without distinguishing whether the Benghazi attack was different from protests elsewhere.
The email lists the following two goals, among others:
"To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy."
"To reinforce the President and Administration's strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges."
The email goes on to state that the U.S. government rejected the message of the Internet video. "We find it disgusting and reprehensible. But there is absolutely no justification at all for responding to this movie with violence," the email stated
Sunday, March 16, 2014
Selective Feminism, Or Women's Rights !
Muslims promote Sharia law.
Christians believe that every person has the right to choose or reject the gospel. We wouldn't think about making our faith a law superior to all other faiths. Imposing it on others as some sort of legal right we are entitled to. God forbid! In this instance you have Democrats, pro abortionists and feminists all across America crying bloody murder, saying that Limbaugh should be taken off the air for his comments in reference to Sandra Fluke . In fact, they have said things to the extent of "Fluke is just an ordinary woman, how dare he say such mean things about her?", "He should be taken off the air or apologize post haste!" (Which he did not soon after).
In the midst of this heated debate I have noticed something. I have observed how some women treat other women differently than others. I have again noticed how this behavior is widely influenced by political or societal events. I also have taken notice of the hypocrisy that it entails. What I am referring to is known as selective feminism. No doubt you have heard the comments issued forth by the right wing Political Shock Jock Rush Limbaugh in reference to Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke, and the firestorm that ensued afterwards.
These very same people have gone on to say that Republicans only want to take away their rights to contraceptives and birth control pills, and that the men, as well as the government, should keep their nose out from between their legs, which I find odd to say the least, since they want a right only the government itself can provide, and also that they allow certain men to fight for them and their "freedom." Okay, lets jump the fence here, to the other side of the political spectrum. I made reference to Fluke and Limbaugh, now lets examine David Letterman and Bill Maher, both Liberals, and their comments about Sarah Palin In June of 2009, David Letterman was caught on air making reference to Sarah Palin as a "slutty flight attendant," going on to make a less than polite joke about her underage daughter Willow!!
"One awkward moment for Sarah Palin at the Yankee game," Letterman said, "during the seventh inning, her daughter was knocked up by Alex Rodriguez."
After Letterman's comment, Sarah Palin immediately responded, accusing him of making inappropriate and sexually perverted statements that he would "have never said about anyone else's daughter, and that "acceptance of sexually inappropriate jokes about someone's underage daughter, who could be anyone's daughter, contributes to the atrociously [sic] high rate of sexual exploitation of minors by older men who use and abuse others," she went on to say. But wait! We then have Bill Maher who, after finding out that Palin had accepted a job as a contributor to Fox News, made this remark about her and her child, Trig, who has Down Syndrome:
“Sarah Palin agreed to do commentary at Fox News, which is actually very similar to her day job, talking to a baby with Down syndrome. Speaking of dumb s**ts, it’s not because they have breasts. It’s because they are boobs."
Once again Palin and the Republican party were outraged. As you know, Sarah Palin is widely known as Republican nominee John McCain's VP candidate, and a Republican herself. In this instance, only the women on the right wing side of the aisle were heard condemning the remarks. Now, here's the kicker, where were the feminists? Where, indeed, were the female Democrats? Not one was to be heard burning her brassiere over these sexually tinged comments, which leads me to my point.
What you saw here was members of feminism being selective of which women to defend, after she is slandered. But then again, a woman is a woman, right? Wrong. Somehow only a Liberal woman is worth defending, but a Conservative one, well, she's on her own. If you happen to be a Liberal woman reading right now, here is a question for you. How come you will defend a woman such as Sandra Fluke, but not ones such as Sarah Palin? They are both women. How can you not be angered when a woman, akin to yourself in all senses of the word, is sexually denigrated by other men? Might it be because she is a conservative? Or maybe it is because she is a pro life advocate? I fail to see the logic in this rationale that one woman is somehow different than another.
We Conservatives support individualism. We support the right of the individual to do what he or SHE wants.
Christians believe that every person has the right to choose or reject the gospel. We wouldn't think about making our faith a law superior to all other faiths. Imposing it on others as some sort of legal right we are entitled to. God forbid! In this instance you have Democrats, pro abortionists and feminists all across America crying bloody murder, saying that Limbaugh should be taken off the air for his comments in reference to Sandra Fluke . In fact, they have said things to the extent of "Fluke is just an ordinary woman, how dare he say such mean things about her?", "He should be taken off the air or apologize post haste!" (Which he did not soon after).
In the midst of this heated debate I have noticed something. I have observed how some women treat other women differently than others. I have again noticed how this behavior is widely influenced by political or societal events. I also have taken notice of the hypocrisy that it entails. What I am referring to is known as selective feminism. No doubt you have heard the comments issued forth by the right wing Political Shock Jock Rush Limbaugh in reference to Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke, and the firestorm that ensued afterwards.
These very same people have gone on to say that Republicans only want to take away their rights to contraceptives and birth control pills, and that the men, as well as the government, should keep their nose out from between their legs, which I find odd to say the least, since they want a right only the government itself can provide, and also that they allow certain men to fight for them and their "freedom." Okay, lets jump the fence here, to the other side of the political spectrum. I made reference to Fluke and Limbaugh, now lets examine David Letterman and Bill Maher, both Liberals, and their comments about Sarah Palin In June of 2009, David Letterman was caught on air making reference to Sarah Palin as a "slutty flight attendant," going on to make a less than polite joke about her underage daughter Willow!!
"One awkward moment for Sarah Palin at the Yankee game," Letterman said, "during the seventh inning, her daughter was knocked up by Alex Rodriguez."
After Letterman's comment, Sarah Palin immediately responded, accusing him of making inappropriate and sexually perverted statements that he would "have never said about anyone else's daughter, and that "acceptance of sexually inappropriate jokes about someone's underage daughter, who could be anyone's daughter, contributes to the atrociously [sic] high rate of sexual exploitation of minors by older men who use and abuse others," she went on to say. But wait! We then have Bill Maher who, after finding out that Palin had accepted a job as a contributor to Fox News, made this remark about her and her child, Trig, who has Down Syndrome:
“Sarah Palin agreed to do commentary at Fox News, which is actually very similar to her day job, talking to a baby with Down syndrome. Speaking of dumb s**ts, it’s not because they have breasts. It’s because they are boobs."
Once again Palin and the Republican party were outraged. As you know, Sarah Palin is widely known as Republican nominee John McCain's VP candidate, and a Republican herself. In this instance, only the women on the right wing side of the aisle were heard condemning the remarks. Now, here's the kicker, where were the feminists? Where, indeed, were the female Democrats? Not one was to be heard burning her brassiere over these sexually tinged comments, which leads me to my point.
What you saw here was members of feminism being selective of which women to defend, after she is slandered. But then again, a woman is a woman, right? Wrong. Somehow only a Liberal woman is worth defending, but a Conservative one, well, she's on her own. If you happen to be a Liberal woman reading right now, here is a question for you. How come you will defend a woman such as Sandra Fluke, but not ones such as Sarah Palin? They are both women. How can you not be angered when a woman, akin to yourself in all senses of the word, is sexually denigrated by other men? Might it be because she is a conservative? Or maybe it is because she is a pro life advocate? I fail to see the logic in this rationale that one woman is somehow different than another.
We Conservatives support individualism. We support the right of the individual to do what he or SHE wants.
Saturday, March 15, 2014
A Culture of Intolerance
It has become quite obvious to me, that there is little tolerance of certain political views that students can hold in school. Especially on hot button issues like abortion. As this 17 year old high school student found out, it's not okay to freely express your worldviews in school. If you don't believe government and politics have any influence in the classroom, you're in for a rude awakening. There is a culture of intolerance expressed by the Liberal teachers, and or professors, that is nurtured in the minds of our children that cannot be allowed to continue. The school should be a place where ideas and views are accepted no matter what they are. The First Amendment applies to everyone, not just to those who hold like views.
People should be able to express themselves freely anywhere without any constraints but one, that such expression doesn't endanger the safety and welfare of others. Speech is nothing but words, words do no harm, actions do.
Free Speech should be unlimited. Where in the First Amendment did the founders issue exceptions?
Liberals have an obvious selective interpretation of the First Amendment when it pertains to undesirable expressions of speech that contradict their worldviews. We call that hypocrisy.
People should be able to express themselves freely anywhere without any constraints but one, that such expression doesn't endanger the safety and welfare of others. Speech is nothing but words, words do no harm, actions do.
Free Speech should be unlimited. Where in the First Amendment did the founders issue exceptions?
Liberals have an obvious selective interpretation of the First Amendment when it pertains to undesirable expressions of speech that contradict their worldviews. We call that hypocrisy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)