Muslims promote Sharia law.
Christians believe that every person has the right to choose or reject the gospel. We wouldn't think about making our faith a law superior to all other faiths. Imposing it on others as some sort of legal right we are entitled to. God forbid!
In this instance you have Democrats, pro abortionists and feminists all
across America crying bloody murder, saying that Limbaugh should be
taken off the air for his comments in reference to Sandra Fluke . In fact, they have said things to
the extent of "Fluke is just an ordinary woman, how dare he say such
mean things about her?", "He should be taken off the air or apologize
post haste!" (Which he did not soon after).
In the midst of this heated debate I have noticed something. I have
observed how some women treat other women differently than others. I
have again noticed how this behavior is widely influenced by political
or societal events. I also have taken notice of the hypocrisy that it
entails. What I am referring to is known as selective feminism. No doubt
you have heard the comments issued forth by the right wing Political Shock Jock Rush Limbaugh in reference to Georgetown law student
Sandra Fluke, and the firestorm that ensued afterwards.
These very same people have gone on to say that Republicans only want to take away their rights
to contraceptives and birth control pills, and that the men, as well as
the government, should keep their nose out from between their legs,
which I find odd to say the least, since they want a right only the
government itself can provide, and also that they allow certain men to
fight for them and their "freedom." Okay, lets jump the fence here, to
the other side of the political spectrum. I made reference to Fluke and
Limbaugh, now lets examine David Letterman and Bill Maher, both
Liberals, and their comments about Sarah Palin In June of 2009, David
Letterman was caught on air making reference to Sarah Palin as a "slutty
flight attendant," going on to make a less than polite joke about her
underage daughter Willow!!
"One awkward moment for Sarah Palin at the Yankee game," Letterman
said, "during the seventh inning, her daughter was knocked up by Alex
After Letterman's comment, Sarah Palin immediately responded, accusing
him of making inappropriate and sexually perverted statements that he
would "have never said about anyone else's daughter, and that
"acceptance of sexually inappropriate jokes about someone's underage
daughter, who could be anyone's daughter, contributes to the atrociously
[sic] high rate of sexual exploitation of minors by older men who use
and abuse others," she went on to say. But wait! We then have Bill
Maher who, after finding out that Palin had accepted a job as a
contributor to Fox News, made this remark about her and her child, Trig,
who has Down Syndrome:
“Sarah Palin agreed to do commentary at Fox News, which is actually
very similar to her day job, talking to a baby with Down syndrome.
Speaking of dumb s**ts, it’s not because they have breasts. It’s because
they are boobs."
Once again Palin and the Republican party were outraged. As you know,
Sarah Palin is widely known as Republican nominee John McCain's VP
candidate, and a Republican herself. In this instance, only the women on
the right wing side of the aisle were heard condemning the remarks. Now, here's the kicker, where were the feminists? Where, indeed, were the female Democrats? Not one was to be heard burning her brassiere over these sexually tinged comments, which leads me to my point.
What you saw here was members of feminism being selective of which women
to defend, after she is slandered. But then again, a woman is a woman,
right? Wrong. Somehow only a Liberal woman is worth defending, but a
Conservative one, well, she's on her own. If you happen to be a Liberal
woman reading right now, here is a question for you. How come you will
defend a woman such as Sandra Fluke, but not ones such as Sarah Palin?
They are both women. How can you not be angered when a woman, akin to
yourself in all senses of the word, is sexually denigrated by other men?
Might it be because she is a conservative? Or maybe it is because she
is a pro life advocate? I fail to see the logic in this rationale that
one woman is somehow different than another.
We Conservatives support individualism. We support the right of the individual to do what he or SHE wants.